Posts tagged as:

Detroit Michigan

When we head that Earl Lucas, Exterior Design manager for the new 2010 Ford Taurus, relied on music as inspiration for the studio, we were intrigued. Lucas said designers often listen to music while they’re designing, sketching or rendering digitally. “The better the music, the more inspired the designer is when coming up with shapes,” Lucas said. “You just feel more creative. Music allows the designer to get into a space that is away from the pressure of the job.”Here’s the playlist Lucas put together for us based on his view of the sleek new Taurus:
[click to continue…]

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook

{ 1 comment }

Wrapped up auto show biz in Detroit where it’s currently hovering in the 0-degree range, with a healthy half-foot of snow. All week long, the commute to Auto Show activities was definitely hindered by snowy unsalted streets, which makes me think that the cash-poor state snuck in budget cuts on snow services. It used to be a problem only in Detroit proper, but now the whole region seems a messy stew. I saw something on the news that sub-zero temps hinder the effectiveness of salt, but it seems that has nothing to do with the padded, squishy substance thats chalked up the freeway for several days. At least I had the good sense to have good wheels for the occasion – the 2009 Jeep Liberty Limited. The current Jeep Liberty came to life in 2008 and handled like a champion in the treacherous conditions that was part of my daily 40 mile commute from family’s home to auto show action.

Jeep Liberty on warmer days
I skipped the cool features like rain-sensing wipers, remote starting, driver memory settings and a power-sliding sunroof, focusing solely on the revised suspension. Luckily, I didn’t have to test the Jeep’s off-road capabilities like so many of the commuters I passed in the ditch, but it felt aggressive and able-bodied on the clunkier stretches of the I-10 Lodge.
a Michigan winter scene

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook

{ 0 comments }

While most of the auto show buzz centered on the despairing economy and the crippled auto sales, there’s enough sexy contours to ease the stress. These cars remind that there’s still swagger in the car game.

For seduction powner no further than the Audi Sportback. This foxy 5-door winner nabbed prizes from Eyes on Design.

Audi  Sportback Concept

Also scoring oohs and ahhs is the Cadillac Converj.
Cadillac Converj

As Michael Strahan awaits delivery of his Fisker Karma, the S Sunset convertible sees daylight for it’s debut in Detroit.

Fisker Karma Sunset S

Of course, the smooth finesse of the Bentley GTC Speed is the stuff of dreams, and Engineering chief Ulrich Eichhorn tells me this version rolls along with even more aptitude.

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3521/3177656516_edb85c476a.jpg?v=0

And Suburu devotees are going crazy for the Legacy concept. We like it, too.
Suburu Legacy Concept

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook

{ 0 comments }

Detroit is down shifting. It was not long ago that the Big Three were best known for speed, horsepower and big hefty torque. So 2008. While the Camaro, Challenger and Mustang souped-up additions were on display, their presence was subdued in lieu of the electrified concept machines — making a slower go at fuel economy. The most surprising is the Lincoln C-Concept with a 4-cylinder EcoBoost. Yet, the word about town was how great Chrysler’s EVS are to drive, as one of my colleagues enthusiastically bragged. Personally, I think the Cadillac Converj is a sexy take on refined luxury for a brand that showed promise since it broke out of the shell a few concept cycles ago.
[click to continue…]

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook

{ 0 comments }

January 12, 1959. The day Barry Gordy opened the doors to Motown. The triumph and the loss and the memory of Motown is a sweet soundtrack for our town of ironies, evasive dreams and hopeful schemes. Today the bittersweet Detroit mentality flies through the air as the press conferences are underway and for another brief moment the world’s camera look at the new cars in Detroit. I’m proud to contribute a small piece to the Detroit Free Press today for the special birthday edition, the newspaper I grew up reading, at one time among the nation’s greatest sources for balanced international news coverage. Along with the automotive coverage and an extensive Motown package is Mitch Albom’s now eponymous Sports Illustrated feature that hit newsstands last week, “We’re not Gum on America’s Shoe,” which is well worth the read for Detroiters in spirir – near and far. Off to the show. Look for GoTryke on Twitter for live Detroit auto show updates. More birthdday surprises to come on the Motown front, too!

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook

{ 0 comments }

The timer has been reset for Detroit — precious billions to spread around for a couple months until the new administration assumes power and rolls up the sleeves for the real work on how to keep the doors open and keep building cars dreamed up by American-based companies. Detroiters across the region are sighing in relief this weekend as the Bush admin choked up the cash. It’s a metaphor for the strung out family member that gets a little extra just because it’s Christmas, a willful present. Not enough to fix the problem, but enough to make it through the cold winter’s night. The message is the same – change or go down with the antiquated ship. But the path to recovery is not so clear.

Yet, while Detroit is temporarily taken off time out, now is the time for mindful leaders to use common sense and acknowledge what needs to be done on a civic level to promote development and change within an industry. That means taking logical steps and stopping the scolding for the sake of political posturing. That means speaking up and acknowledging responsibility for government’s part in the problem. That means examining an infrastructure that is not designed for sustainable transportation in it’s planes, trains and automobiles. That means working directly with fuel companies and emerging companies capable of providing viable renewable resources That means creating hydrogen filling stations to speed up access to emissions free automobiles. That means working on a federal level with states to modify emissions laws to create a universal standard for diesel vehicles. That means concentrating on encouraging consumers to drive smaller cars and actually encourage Americans to look at new products with some kind of praise. Or do better, and build on existing research efforts at universities such as MIT and the University of Michigan that already are working with a coalition of car companies for the next big green break. That means looking at the global market and take initiatives to be a leader and not a follower of countries like Brazil and Sweden. That means changing how we think about driving and moving ourselves around.

The solution is probably a bit of all of the above. Truth is, we’re still very far off from the solution. The car companies can build it, but the infrastructure can’t sustain it and the question is unclear whether the consumer will actually dish the dough out for it. This SF Chronicle editorial passage explores some of these technological advances with stony realism.
Highly hyped and subsidized hydrogen cars rely on the most impractical fuel on the planet. Beyond the estimated $2 trillion we’d need to build production infrastructure and filling stations, hydrogen is the most co-dependent atom on Earth (it just hates to be alone).

The energy needed to pry it from water, compress it into tanks and then convert it into electricity in a fuel cell wipes out 80 percent of its energy at the axle. That energy has to come from somewhere – like a coal-fired power plant. Not to mention the energy needed to truck hydrogen to filling stations. If they existed.Heavily subsidized corn ethanol generates far more carbon than it saves. Intended or not, almost all biofuel production leads to new land being cleared, directly or indirectly – which (whether scrubland or rain forest) releases 93 times the volume of greenhouse gas saved by fuel from that land, according to a Nature Conservancy scientist published in the journal Science.

None of this is to suggest we can’t do better. But hydrogen cars are 80 percent energy-inefficient and 100 percent unaffordable. And biofuels cause 93 times more global warming than gasoline. Take lines like that out of context, and they sound like Ronald Reagan calling ketchup a vegetable. But such is the state of our subsidized knowledge, as of now.


While hybrids also wear a green face, it’s widely known that they just aren’t enough to reduce global warming on their own, with fuel economy numbers that are only slightly better than gasoline counterparts. No one has the solution, but it lies somewhere in the structure, in setting up a process that is not built on earning reports for every quarter, but a long term slow climb, and educating average drivers, riders, and commuters about the choices they are making, in finding a healthy balance between competition and cooperation among all carmakers. It’s about using what we do have — a strong manufacturing arm centralized in the US, with experience and knowledge on how to move the line efficiently forward. We need to support that process with the implementation of green ways that support research, sustain jobs and reach consumers. What we need is a country built on development and the pursuit of a future with clear goals built on firm humble beginnings. We need sturdy vehicles and a collective conscience, too. What we need most is patience and clear thinking.


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook

{ 0 comments }

John Simpson originally published this piece in the editorial section of the Michigan Chronicle. He shares his sentiments and struggles with his hometown Detroit on GoTryke.com.

For decades, the city of Detroit was synonymous with African American Pride. It was a city, unlike many other cities, where you could see other black folks. Folks just like you and me, in positions of power. In positions traditionally reserved for whites. Detroit had black mayors, black police chiefs and black city council persons. We had Black auto execs, business and community leaders, Black Judges and black politicians. It was a city where a strong auto industry allowed blacks to enjoy the blessings of home ownership and a middle class lifestyle. A lifestyle that we as black Detroiters grew accustomed and felt entitled to. Detroit also built a legacy in the music and entertainment world. As the Motor City and Motown, Detroit had unparalleled international swagger. I grew up in Detroit. Off 7 Mile and Livernois. I spent many a night at Palmer Park eating Boogaloo sandwiches and drinking Faygo red pop. It meant something to say “I’m from Detroit.” Or as the young people put it, “I’m from the D.”
Faygo pop
People, what happened to our city? What happened to that swagger? How did we become a city known more for its crime rate and poverty than for its rich historical contributions? “How did we earn the title of a dying city”? How did we develop such a tarnished image? How did we become a city that if you do well in school or speak the kings English, you are labeled a sell out and your blackness is called into question? Where keeping it real (ignorant) has eclipsed the concepts of being educated, well mannered and professional. How did we become a city riddled with political scandal that continues to lose young talented individuals by the thousands. Where we litter our own neighborhoods? How does an old shoe wind upon the freeway anyway? What happened to us Detroit?

I recently came across a quote in the local newspaper from Ken Cockrel, the newly sworn Mayor of the City of Detroit. He explained the exodus of Detroiters to the suburbs. “If you’re going to pay a 30% surcharge for automobile insurance, if you’re going to be living down the street from some school where you’re not comfortable sending your child because your child might find himself or herself exposed to a 26-round semiautomatic MAC-10 brought by some progeny of an irresponsible parent. Those are real considerations. “I’m not going to condemn anybody who says, ‘I can’t deal with it.”
Mayor Kenneth Cockrel Jr.
He’s talking about me. Eight years ago when I married and had children, I packed up my family and left the city of Detroit. I left Detroit kicking and screaming. My wife wanted to move. I did not. At one point, during one of our many fights about whether or not to leave Detroit, my wife asked, “So if we stay in Detroit, ‘do we keep the pistol on the night stand or under the pillow?”

Enough said. I lost and out of Detroit we moved. Actually, since then we have moved twice. Each time a little further from Detroit. But did I really lose the argument? It’s nice out here. Bigger house for the wife and kids. Polite neighbors, and great “public schools.” Out here we have all the amenities one could hope for. Restaurants, entertainment, shopping, All that.

Wow. Folks out here have it good. Did I say that already? Since being out here, I’ve also gained a troubling new perspective on home. The sense that for years I had the wool pulled over my eyes. I thought that crack heads and bulletproof glass was a way of life. That car jacking and home invasion was commonplace. Grocery stores offered sub par produce and “light brown meat.” Iron security doors and bars on every window were standard. In many instances we were prisoners in our own homes. Liquor stores on every corner and abandoned buildings were just part of the landscape.

Sadly, I had not only become accustomed to, but had grown to accept living in fear and chaos, in conditions often less civilized than the city zoo. That was life. Or so I thought. Ultimately, I came to realize– as did many of my now-suburban neighbors– we had a choice. We didn’t have to live like that. We were refugees of Detroit, no longer willing to sacrifice quality of life for loyalty to the town we had loved so much.

My dilemma is this… I desperately I want to come home to Detroit. A city so rich in culture and heritage, now buried beneath the rubble of failed leadership. The city that has turned out so many brilliant products and people. The city that gave us the automobile and the Motown sound, Joe Louis and Faygo pop, Aretha Franklin and Coleman Young, Berry Gordy and Damon Keith. All made in Detroit. Detroit helped shape everything about me. But as a business man with a family, I cannot overlook the fact that it costs considerably more to live in Detroit. I did the math. “Out here” I have more house, lower taxes, and more amenities. Better schools, cleaner safer streets and peace of mind. Did I mention “fresh red meat.”? Out here I get much more for much less.

I understand that a large urban city such as Detroit is going to have more challenges than wealthier suburbs. However, I would move home in a heartbeat if I believed that Detroit was moving in the right direction, was meeting those challenges head-on, and was on a path toward better schools, safer streets and “a better quality of life.” It is easy for some to argue that in order for me to realize my dream of returning to a better Detroit, I need to take personal actions to help make it a better Detroit. I know. I know. Stop being part of the problem and become part of the solution. Stop talking about it and be about it.We need to start being more sophisticated about how we pick our leaders and the criteria we use to choose. We need to demand accountability from our leadership. We need to become more active in our community. We need to commit to quality education for our children. We need to take responsibility for not only ourselves but for our neighbors. Absolutely, we – or rather I say I? – need to be better.

I’ll work on that. But in the meantime, I need to reconcile my own confusion and uncertainty about what is real for me at this point in my life. Is home still home when the people and places you cherish have all but vanished? As a true Detroiter, am I incapable of building a home elsewhere? Have I temporarily relocated to this Suburban utopia waiting for my real home in the city to be rebuilt? Is the prospect of a new Detroit achievable in the foreseeable future? Against all my other life demands, do I have the time, energy, and patience to help overhaul the mess that has been made in Detroit?

Such questions sadden me because here’s the real truth: while it’s nice out here in suburbia, I never truly feel at home, and doubt I ever will. I’ll never feel as though I really belong. It’s a bit like driving someone else’s brand new car: it’s handles great but it ain’t yours. For now, at least, even in borrowed wheels, I’ve found a lane that’s moving. Home, as I know it, is fading in my rear view. There’s a point on the road of every journey when making a U-turn seems out of the question. I am nearing that point. None the less, I want to come home. Real talk.
null

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Related Posts with Thumbnails

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook

{ 10 comments }